The need for clearance

Explosive threats do not end when conflicts do

The need for clearance

Explosive threats do not end when conflicts do

The need for clearance

Explosive threats do not end when conflicts do

The need for clearance

Explosive threats do not end when conflicts do

Our why
Our solutions
Our solutions

Armed conflict leaves behind more than physical destruction. Long after fighting stops, explosive hazards remain embedded in the ground, buildings, infrastructure and waterways. Landmines, Explosive Remnants of War (ERW) and Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) continue to kill and injure civilians, restrict movement and delay recovery for years or decades.

Explosive contamination is not a historical problem. It is an ongoing and expanding challenge driven by contemporary conflicts, the widespread use of explosive weapons and the long lifespan of unexploded ordnance. In many affected regions, the presence of explosive hazards defines what can and cannot be done long after hostilities have ceased.

Clearing these threats is a prerequisite for safety, recovery and stability.

Challenge

A growing and evolving challenge

The scale and complexity of explosive contamination continues to increase.

Challenge

A growing and evolving challenge

The scale and complexity of explosive contamination continues to increase.

Challenge

A growing and evolving challenge

The scale and complexity of explosive contamination continues to increase.

Challenge

A growing and evolving challenge

The scale and complexity of explosive contamination continues to increase.

With an increase in global hostilities, explosive contamination is on the rise

With an increase in global hostilities, explosive contamination is on the rise

More than 60 countries remain affected by landmines and ERW

More than 60 countries remain affected by landmines and ERW

Withdrawals from international arms control agreements increase future risks

Withdrawals from international arms control agreements increase future risks

New delivery methods, including drones and loitering munitions, add complexity to clearance

New delivery methods, including drones and loitering munitions, add complexity to clearance

Main Categories

Explosive threats

Main Categories

Explosive threats

Main Categories

Explosive threats

Main Categories

Explosive threats

Mines

Landmines are victim-activated explosive devices designed to detonate through the presence, proximity or contact of a person or vehicle.

  • Anti-Personnel (AP) mines are designed to injure or kill individuals

  • Anti-Vehicle (AV) or Anti-Tank (AT) mines are designed to disable or destroy vehicles

  • Sea mines pose risks to ports, waterways and coastal access

    An estimated 100 million landmines remain in more than 78 countries. Many of them remain active for decades. 

In addition to causing casualties, mines contaminate land and infrastructure. This prevents agricultural use, blocks transport routes, and delays the return of displaced populations. Their presence directly impacts food security, livelihoods, and long-term stability.

Explosive Remnants of War (ERW)

ERW are explosive ordnance left behind after the end of hostilities. They pose risks similar to landmines and are often less visible or predictable.

ERW are typically categorised as:

  • Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) includes ammunition such as artillery shells, grenades, mortar rounds, cluster munitions, missiles, bombs, and fuses that failed to function as intended.

  • Abandoned Explosive Ordnance (AXO) includes arms caches, weapon depots, storage sites and stockpiles left unsecured or unmanaged.

ERW contamination is widespread in former battle areas and urban environments. Clearance is often the first step before reconstruction, infrastructure repair or the return of displaced populations can begin.

Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs)

IEDs are improvised weapons designed to cause damage, casualties and disruption. Their use has increased significantly over the past decades and remains a defining feature of many modern conflicts.
IEDs are used by non-state armed groups and other actors to target civilians, security forces and infrastructure. They are often deliberately concealed and designed to be unpredictable.

IEDs can be categorised by their initiation method:

  • Timed IEDs, initiated by a fuse or timer

  • Command-initiated IEDs, triggered remotely by wire or radio control

  • Victim-operated IEDs, activated by an unknowing action such as pressure or tripwires

The detection, neutralisation and disposal of IEDs requires specialised expertise and equipment. This activity, referred to as IEDD, is a subset of Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD).

Emerging threats

Modern conflicts increasingly involve unmanned systems as delivery platforms for conventional and improvised explosive ordnance, referred to as Drone Delivered Explosive Ordnance.

These threats blur traditional distinctions between mines, ERW and IEDs and further increase the need for adaptable, technology-supported clearance capabilities.

Emerging threats

Modern conflicts increasingly involve unmanned systems as delivery platforms for conventional and improvised explosive ordnance, referred to as Drone Delivered Explosive Ordnance.

These threats blur traditional distinctions between mines, ERW and IEDs and further increase the need for adaptable, technology-supported clearance capabilities.

Emerging threats

Modern conflicts increasingly involve unmanned systems as delivery platforms for conventional and improvised explosive ordnance, referred to as Drone Delivered Explosive Ordnance.

These threats blur traditional distinctions between mines, ERW and IEDs and further increase the need for adaptable, technology-supported clearance capabilities.

Emerging threats

Modern conflicts increasingly involve unmanned systems as delivery platforms for conventional and improvised explosive ordnance, referred to as Drone Delivered Explosive Ordnance.

These threats blur traditional distinctions between mines, ERW and IEDs and further increase the need for adaptable, technology-supported clearance capabilities.

The role of clearance

Explosive hazards affect far more than immediate safety.

In operational environments, explosive threats can stop entire missions. In civilian contexts, they lock communities into prolonged insecurity.

The role of clearance

Explosive hazards affect far more than immediate safety.

In operational environments, explosive threats can stop entire missions. In civilian contexts, they lock communities into prolonged insecurity.

The role of clearance

Explosive hazards affect far more than immediate safety.

In operational environments, explosive threats can stop entire missions. In civilian contexts, they lock communities into prolonged insecurity.

The role of clearance

Explosive hazards affect far more than immediate safety.

In operational environments, explosive threats can stop entire missions. In civilian contexts, they lock communities into prolonged insecurity.

No Access

Block access to homes, farmland and workplaces

No Assistance

Halt humanitarian assistance and reconstruction

No freedom

Restrict freedom of movement for civilians and security forces

No Economic recovery

Prevent economic recovery and long-term development

No Infrastructure

Undermine trust in public space and infrastructure

Road to recovery

Demining is the first step towards recovery

Road to recovery

Demining is the first step towards recovery

Road to recovery

Demining is the first step towards recovery

Road to recovery

Demining is the first step towards recovery

Before land can be rebuilt, used or protected, it must be made safe.
In humanitarian contexts, clearance enables displaced populations to return, agriculture to resume and infrastructure to be repaired. In governmental and commercial contexts, it allows projects, transport and services to move forward. In military and security contexts, it restores freedom of movement and operational effectiveness.

Across all contexts, explosive threat mitigation requires more than individual tools. It demands integrated systems, trained personnel and sustained operational support.

Operational complexity

Why specialised organisations exist

Explosive threats are complex, diverse and persistent. No single method, platform or discipline can address them alone.

Operational complexity

Why specialised organisations exist

Explosive threats are complex, diverse and persistent. No single method, platform or discipline can address them alone.

Operational complexity

Why specialised organisations exist

Explosive threats are complex, diverse and persistent. No single method, platform or discipline can address them alone.

Operational complexity

Why specialised organisations exist

Explosive threats are complex, diverse and persistent. No single method, platform or discipline can address them alone.

What effective clearance requires

A precise understanding of the threat environment

The right combination of mechanical, manual and technical methods

Detection, neutralisation and disposal expertise

Trained operators and robust safety management

Long-term support, maintenance and adaptation

Why specialised organisations like GCS exist

We combine technology, operational expertise and field experience into solutions that reduce risk and restore access safely and reliably.

The purpose of explosive threat mitigation is about outcomes:

Safe land. Secure mmovement. Restored operations. Recovered communities.

Together, we create safe environments.

We turn explosive risk into safe access

Explore how GCS makes the world saver.

We turn explosive risk into safe access

Explore how GCS makes the world saver.

We turn explosive risk into safe access

Explore how GCS makes the world saver.

We turn explosive risk into safe access

Explore how GCS makes the world saver.